gutter-guy-100:

Listen. Y’all can argue all day and we can go back and forth forever on “it’s just fiction” and “it’s not hurting anyone” but at the end of the day, you need to look inside yourself and ask why you want to see a character that is underage in sexual situations and in sexual relationships with adults. It says a lot about who you are.

6,817 notesReblogged at 10:42am, 03/06/18
Via: 298320482349204821999
  1. rainbowtechnadrome reblogged this from locusnegotium
  2. locusnegotium reblogged this from manywinged
  3. transfemgodtamer reblogged this from ambitiousanarchist
  4. cephalonsuda reblogged this from sometimesminze
  5. tallulalusa said: @bibelotbrain if it’s used to groom kids, that judgement falls on the predator. if a kid just waltzes into a space for adults with no supervision, their parents failed in raising them and in monitoring their content. it is not the responsibility of other adults to look after your kids
  6. bibelotbrain said: @tallulalusa If it’s actively harming people, as in being used to groom kids to sexually submit to adults, then yes, judgement is warranted. “The only ones who participate in the cycle of trauma and abuse? Abusive people.” As if enabling them, portraying them as actually good, and giving them tools is blameless? Tags - sure, they have their uses. But kids aren’t known for seeing “warning, this contains x” and saying, “ah, I’ll just back away because I’m too young for it”
  7. mello-jello29 reblogged this from sjdean
  8. par-ty reblogged this from mutantgeniuz
  9. tallteebudkweeen reblogged this from mutantgeniuz
  10. mutantgeniuz reblogged this from gutter-guy-100
  11. gutter-guy-100 posted this